{"id":257,"date":"2026-01-16T18:09:24","date_gmt":"2026-01-16T18:09:24","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.mvpthemes.com\/jawn\/?p=257"},"modified":"2026-01-16T18:09:25","modified_gmt":"2026-01-16T18:09:25","slug":"adam-scott-will-appear-in-jordan-peeles-twilight-zone-reboot","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lawfarewatch.org\/?p=257","title":{"rendered":"Why We Support Isabel dos Santos?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">At <\/span><b>Lawfare Watch<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, our mission is to expose the weaponisation of justice <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">lawfare<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> where legal systems are used not to deliver accountability, but to destroy individuals through politically motivated prosecutions, media trials, and judicial overreach.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">After extensive review, <\/span><b>we support Isabel dos Santos<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> because her case reflects many of the most troubling patterns of lawfare we document worldwide.<\/span><\/p>\n<h2><b>A Case Tried in the Media Before the Courts<\/b><\/h2>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Isabel dos Santos has been subjected to a sustained global campaign of accusation, reputational destruction, and asset targeting often <\/span><b>before any final judicial determination<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">. Headlines, leaks, and political statements have replaced due process, creating a presumption of guilt that precedes evidence.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">At the centre of the allegations are claims of:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">embezzlement and mismanagement at state-linked companies,<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">money laundering and fraud,<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">illicit enrichment linked to her father\u2019s presidency,<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">and a broad catalogue of financial crimes in Angola.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">These accusations have been widely circulated as fact. Yet <\/span><b>accusation is not conviction<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, and repetition is not proof.<\/span><\/p>\n<h2><b>Disputed Allegations, Not Established Guilt<\/b><\/h2>\n<h3><b>1. Embezzlement &amp; Mismanagement<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Isabel dos Santos has consistently <\/span><b>denied allegations<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> that she siphoned public funds from companies such as Sonangol or Unitel. She maintains that:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">her roles were <\/span><b>formal appointments<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> made under existing corporate and legal frameworks at the time,<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">transactions cited as \u201cembezzlement\u201d were <\/span><b>documented corporate operations<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, loans, or shareholder arrangements,<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">and that no court has produced a final ruling establishing criminal intent or personal enrichment through these roles.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Independent reviews show that many claims rely on <\/span><b>retrospective political interpretations<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> of past governance decisions, rather than contemporaneous findings of illegality.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>2. Money Laundering &amp; Fraud<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The narrative of complex offshore schemes has been presented as proof of criminality. However:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">the use of international holding structures is <\/span><b>common in global business<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">,<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">many transactions cited were <\/span><b>audited, taxed, and declared<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> in relevant jurisdictions,<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">and several asset freezes and enforcement actions abroad have been <\/span><b>challenged or overturned<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> due to procedural flaws, lack of jurisdiction, or insufficient evidentiary standards.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Financial complexity has been repeatedly conflated with criminality a hallmark of lawfare cases worldwide.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>3. Illicit Enrichment &amp; \u201cLuanda Leaks\u201d<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Luanda Leaks<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> investigation relied heavily on leaked documents, anonymous sourcing, and selective interpretation of data. Isabel dos Santos has stated that:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">key documents were <\/span><b>misrepresented or taken out of context<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">,<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">no court has validated the leaks as proof of criminal guilt,<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">and the investigation coincided with a <\/span><b>major political transition<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> in Angola, during which dismantling the influence of the previous elite became an explicit political objective.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Media investigations, however detailed, <\/span><b>do not replace judicial proof<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>4. Criminal Charges in Angola<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Isabel dos Santos faces multiple charges in Angola, yet:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">proceedings have occurred in a context where judicial independence has been <\/span><b>widely questioned<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">,<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">assets were frozen <\/span><b>before trial<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, severely impairing her ability to defend herself,<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">and public officials repeatedly declared her \u201cguilty\u201d <\/span><b>before verdicts<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, undermining the presumption of innocence.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">These conditions mirror patterns seen in other lawfare cases, where courts become instruments of political realignment.<\/span><\/p>\n<h2><b>Findings of Lawfare Watch<\/b><\/h2>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">After conducting an <\/span><b>independent review with legal and investigative associates<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, Lawfare Watch concludes that:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The accusations against Isabel dos Santos show <\/span><b>strong indicators of political motivation<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">,<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Legal actions appear coordinated with <\/span><b>state narratives and media campaigns<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">,<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Due process safeguards have been repeatedly weakened or bypassed,<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Punitive measures (asset freezes, reputational destruction) have preceded final judgments,<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The cumulative objective appears to be <\/span><b>neutralisation and deterrence<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, not impartial justice.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In our assessment, this constitutes a <\/span><b>politically driven judicial campaign<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> rather than a neutral pursuit of accountability.<\/span><\/p>\n<h2><b>The Human Cost of Lawfare<\/b><\/h2>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Beyond legal arguments lies a human reality.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Years of accusations have resulted in:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">loss of livelihood and assets,<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">forced exile,<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">isolation,<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">reputational erasure,<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">and enduring psychological harm.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Lawfare does not only punish its targets it <\/span><b>warns others<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">. It signals that political shifts can retroactively criminalise lives, careers, and identities.<\/span><\/p>\n<h2><b>Why This Matters Beyond One Person<\/b><\/h2>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">This case is not only about Isabel dos Santos.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">It is about whether:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">justice systems can be used to rewrite history,<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">courts can be mobilised as political weapons,<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">and public opinion can be engineered to accept punishment without proof.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">When lawfare succeeds once, it spreads.<\/span><\/p>\n<h2><b>Our Call<\/b><\/h2>\n<p><b>Lawfare Watch supports Isabel dos Santos<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> because defending her right to due process is defending the integrity of justice itself.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">We call on:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">legal professionals,<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">civil society,<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">journalists,<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">academics,<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">and citizens of conscience<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">to look beyond headlines, question narratives, and demand <\/span><b>evidence, fairness, and judicial independence<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>At Lawfare Watch, our mission is to expose the weaponisation of justice lawfare where legal systems are used not to deliver accountability, but to destroy individuals through politically motivated prosecutions, media trials, and judicial overreach. After extensive review, we support Isabel dos Santos because her case reflects many of the most troubling patterns of lawfare [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":440,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"video","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[6,22,31,36,59,127],"class_list":["post-257","post","type-post","status-publish","format-video","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-reports","tag-adam-scott","tag-culture","tag-entertainment","tag-featured","tag-jordan-peele","tag-twilight-zone","post_format-post-format-video"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.4 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Why We Support Isabel dos Santos? - LAWFARE WATCH<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/lawfarewatch.org\/?p=257\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Why We Support Isabel dos Santos? - LAWFARE WATCH\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"At Lawfare Watch, our mission is to expose the weaponisation of justice lawfare where legal systems are used not to deliver accountability, but to destroy individuals through politically motivated prosecutions, media trials, and judicial overreach. After extensive review, we support Isabel dos Santos because her case reflects many of the most troubling patterns of lawfare [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/lawfarewatch.org\/?p=257\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"LAWFARE WATCH\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Lawfarewatch\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-01-16T18:09:24+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-01-16T18:09:25+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/lawfarewatch.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/11\/standard_Isabel_dos_Santos040916_1_.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"800\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@Lawfarewatch\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Lawfarewatch\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfarewatch.org\\\/?p=257#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfarewatch.org\\\/?p=257\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"http:\\\/\\\/lawfarewatch.org\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/f72e33e082016da42db629859d87b63a\"},\"headline\":\"Why We Support Isabel dos Santos?\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-01-16T18:09:24+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-01-16T18:09:25+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfarewatch.org\\\/?p=257\"},\"wordCount\":733,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"http:\\\/\\\/lawfarewatch.org\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfarewatch.org\\\/?p=257#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfarewatch.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2018\\\/11\\\/standard_Isabel_dos_Santos040916_1_.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"Adam Scott\",\"Culture\",\"Entertainment\",\"Featured\",\"Jordan Peele\",\"Twilight Zone\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Reports\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfarewatch.org\\\/?p=257#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfarewatch.org\\\/?p=257\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfarewatch.org\\\/?p=257\",\"name\":\"Why We Support Isabel dos Santos? - LAWFARE WATCH\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"http:\\\/\\\/lawfarewatch.org\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfarewatch.org\\\/?p=257#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfarewatch.org\\\/?p=257#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfarewatch.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2018\\\/11\\\/standard_Isabel_dos_Santos040916_1_.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-01-16T18:09:24+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-01-16T18:09:25+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfarewatch.org\\\/?p=257#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfarewatch.org\\\/?p=257\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfarewatch.org\\\/?p=257#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfarewatch.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2018\\\/11\\\/standard_Isabel_dos_Santos040916_1_.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfarewatch.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2018\\\/11\\\/standard_Isabel_dos_Santos040916_1_.jpg\",\"width\":1200,\"height\":800},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfarewatch.org\\\/?p=257#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"http:\\\/\\\/lawfarewatch.org\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Why We Support Isabel dos Santos?\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"http:\\\/\\\/lawfarewatch.org\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"http:\\\/\\\/lawfarewatch.org\\\/\",\"name\":\"LAWFARE WATCH\",\"description\":\"Exposing Justice When It&rsquo;s Weaponised\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"http:\\\/\\\/lawfarewatch.org\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"http:\\\/\\\/lawfarewatch.org\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"http:\\\/\\\/lawfarewatch.org\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"LAWFARE WATCH\",\"url\":\"http:\\\/\\\/lawfarewatch.org\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en\",\"@id\":\"http:\\\/\\\/lawfarewatch.org\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"http:\\\/\\\/lawfarewatch.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/ChatGPT-Image-Jan-9-2026-10_06_26-AM-1.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"http:\\\/\\\/lawfarewatch.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/ChatGPT-Image-Jan-9-2026-10_06_26-AM-1.png\",\"width\":1024,\"height\":1024,\"caption\":\"LAWFARE WATCH\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"http:\\\/\\\/lawfarewatch.org\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/Lawfarewatch\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Lawfarewatch\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.instagram.com\\\/lawfarewatch\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"http:\\\/\\\/lawfarewatch.org\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/f72e33e082016da42db629859d87b63a\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1462138564925e0a64c4c84a7a63c954f55265e1e34f854be2141a32d041be9b?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1462138564925e0a64c4c84a7a63c954f55265e1e34f854be2141a32d041be9b?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1462138564925e0a64c4c84a7a63c954f55265e1e34f854be2141a32d041be9b?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\\\/\\\/lawfarewatch.org\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/lawfarewatch.org\\\/?author=1\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Why We Support Isabel dos Santos? - LAWFARE WATCH","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/lawfarewatch.org\/?p=257","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Why We Support Isabel dos Santos? - LAWFARE WATCH","og_description":"At Lawfare Watch, our mission is to expose the weaponisation of justice lawfare where legal systems are used not to deliver accountability, but to destroy individuals through politically motivated prosecutions, media trials, and judicial overreach. After extensive review, we support Isabel dos Santos because her case reflects many of the most troubling patterns of lawfare [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/lawfarewatch.org\/?p=257","og_site_name":"LAWFARE WATCH","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Lawfarewatch\/","article_published_time":"2026-01-16T18:09:24+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-01-16T18:09:25+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1200,"height":800,"url":"https:\/\/lawfarewatch.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/11\/standard_Isabel_dos_Santos040916_1_.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@Lawfarewatch","twitter_site":"@Lawfarewatch","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/lawfarewatch.org\/?p=257#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/lawfarewatch.org\/?p=257"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"http:\/\/lawfarewatch.org\/#\/schema\/person\/f72e33e082016da42db629859d87b63a"},"headline":"Why We Support Isabel dos Santos?","datePublished":"2026-01-16T18:09:24+00:00","dateModified":"2026-01-16T18:09:25+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/lawfarewatch.org\/?p=257"},"wordCount":733,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"http:\/\/lawfarewatch.org\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/lawfarewatch.org\/?p=257#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/lawfarewatch.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/11\/standard_Isabel_dos_Santos040916_1_.jpg","keywords":["Adam Scott","Culture","Entertainment","Featured","Jordan Peele","Twilight Zone"],"articleSection":["Reports"],"inLanguage":"en","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/lawfarewatch.org\/?p=257#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/lawfarewatch.org\/?p=257","url":"https:\/\/lawfarewatch.org\/?p=257","name":"Why We Support Isabel dos Santos? - LAWFARE WATCH","isPartOf":{"@id":"http:\/\/lawfarewatch.org\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/lawfarewatch.org\/?p=257#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/lawfarewatch.org\/?p=257#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/lawfarewatch.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/11\/standard_Isabel_dos_Santos040916_1_.jpg","datePublished":"2026-01-16T18:09:24+00:00","dateModified":"2026-01-16T18:09:25+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/lawfarewatch.org\/?p=257#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/lawfarewatch.org\/?p=257"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en","@id":"https:\/\/lawfarewatch.org\/?p=257#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/lawfarewatch.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/11\/standard_Isabel_dos_Santos040916_1_.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/lawfarewatch.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/11\/standard_Isabel_dos_Santos040916_1_.jpg","width":1200,"height":800},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/lawfarewatch.org\/?p=257#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"http:\/\/lawfarewatch.org\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Why We Support Isabel dos Santos?"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"http:\/\/lawfarewatch.org\/#website","url":"http:\/\/lawfarewatch.org\/","name":"LAWFARE WATCH","description":"Exposing Justice When It&rsquo;s Weaponised","publisher":{"@id":"http:\/\/lawfarewatch.org\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"http:\/\/lawfarewatch.org\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"http:\/\/lawfarewatch.org\/#organization","name":"LAWFARE WATCH","url":"http:\/\/lawfarewatch.org\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en","@id":"http:\/\/lawfarewatch.org\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"http:\/\/lawfarewatch.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/ChatGPT-Image-Jan-9-2026-10_06_26-AM-1.png","contentUrl":"http:\/\/lawfarewatch.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/ChatGPT-Image-Jan-9-2026-10_06_26-AM-1.png","width":1024,"height":1024,"caption":"LAWFARE WATCH"},"image":{"@id":"http:\/\/lawfarewatch.org\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Lawfarewatch\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Lawfarewatch","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/lawfarewatch"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"http:\/\/lawfarewatch.org\/#\/schema\/person\/f72e33e082016da42db629859d87b63a","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1462138564925e0a64c4c84a7a63c954f55265e1e34f854be2141a32d041be9b?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1462138564925e0a64c4c84a7a63c954f55265e1e34f854be2141a32d041be9b?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1462138564925e0a64c4c84a7a63c954f55265e1e34f854be2141a32d041be9b?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"admin"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/lawfarewatch.org"],"url":"https:\/\/lawfarewatch.org\/?author=1"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lawfarewatch.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/257","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lawfarewatch.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lawfarewatch.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawfarewatch.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawfarewatch.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=257"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/lawfarewatch.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/257\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":494,"href":"https:\/\/lawfarewatch.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/257\/revisions\/494"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawfarewatch.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/440"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lawfarewatch.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=257"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawfarewatch.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=257"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawfarewatch.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=257"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}